A Review of Current Differences in Medical Imaging: Focus on MRI, CT, and DR

Authors

  • Zisheng Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/dh890n42

Keywords:

MRI, CT, DR, Medical Imaging, Radiation Safety.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and digital radiogra- phy (DR) are primary medical imaging technologies that act as core diagnostic tools needed in modern practices. But the public’s grasp of these technologies is often muddled, leading to several misunderstandings about their mechanism of action, uses and safety profiles. These modalities differ significantly in data acquisition and imaging principles, we will discuss the non-irradiant approach of MRI versus the radiation-based methods of CT and DR, we simulate the relaxation dynamics and imaging parameters to understand the uniqueness of each of the techniques, from superb soft tissue contrast of MRI, well-defined visualization of high-density structures in CT, and practical utility of a DR for fast diagnostics. In addition to healthcare described above, the potential use of X-ray and neutral particle beams for security screening and industrial imaging applications is also described, to give a wider view of the current status and future directions for these technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure. New England Journal of Medicine, 2007; 357 (22): 2277 - 2284.

[2] Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation Dose Associated with Common Computed Tomography Examinations and the Associated Lifetime Attributable Risk of Cancer. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2009; 169 (22): 2078 - 2086.

[3] Schauer DA, Linton OW. NCRP Report No. 160, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States. Medical Physics, 2009; 36 (11): 5305 - 5309.

[4] Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. 3rd Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.

[5] McRobbie DW, Moore EA, Graves MJ, Prince MR. MRI from Picture to Proton. 3rd Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2017.

[6] Kalender WA. Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, System Technology, Image Quality, Applications. Publicis Publishing, 2011.

[7] Boas FE, Fleischmann D. CT Artifacts: Causes and Reduction Techniques. Imaging in Medicine, 2012; 4 (2): 229 - 240.

[8] Hendee WR, Ritenour ER. Medical Imaging Physics. 4th Edition. Wiley-Liss, 2002.

[9] Seibert JA, Boone JM. X-ray Imaging Physics for Radiologic Technologists. Radiologic Technology, 2005; 76 (5): 417 - 439.

[10] Krupinski EA. Digital Radiography Image Quality: Image Processing and Display. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2007; 4 (6): 390 - 400.

[11] Stanisz GJ, Odrobina EE, Pun J, Escaravage M, Graham SJ, Bronskill MJ, Henkelman RM. T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005; 54 (3): 507 - 512.

[12] Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, Chenevert TL, Thoeny HC, Takahara T, Dzik-Jurasz A. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations. Neoplasia, 2009; 11 (2): 102 - 125.

[13] Goo HW, Goo JM. Dual-Energy CT: New Horizon in Medical Imaging. Korean Journal of Radiology, 2017; 18 (4): 555 - 569.

[14] Dobbins JT, McAdams HP. Chest Radiography: Digital and Conventional. Radiology, 2003; 227 (1): 11 - 25.

[15] Kuhl CK, Traber F, Schild HH. Whole-Body High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice. Part I. Technical Considerations and Clinical Applications. Radiology, 2008; 246 (3): 675 - 696.

Downloads

Published

29-07-2025

How to Cite

Wang, Z. (2025). A Review of Current Differences in Medical Imaging: Focus on MRI, CT, and DR. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 149, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.54097/dh890n42