A Study on the Impact of Nuclear Pollution Discharge on the Seafood Industry in Coastal Cities Based on the DID-SARIMA Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/fy4z4r12Keywords:
Nuclear Polluted Water Discharge, Seafood Industry Economy, DID, SARIMA Model.Abstract
In recent years, the issue of nuclear wastewater treatment has garnered considerable attention. Investigating the specific impact mechanisms of nuclear pollution on the development of the seafood industry holds significant importance for national economic development. Based on this premise, this study first examines the influence of nuclear wastewater discharge from Country J on the willingness of City Q’s residents to purchase seafood through a comparative survey. Then, a DID (Difference-in-Differences) model and a SARIMA (Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average) time series model are constructed to analyze the impact mechanisms of nuclear pollution discharge on the seafood economy. The empirical results indicate that Country J’s nuclear wastewater discharge practices negatively affect the cumulative growth rate of sales in City Q and also reduce residents’ willingness to purchase seafood. Based on these findings, this study provides relevant policy recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders in the seafood industry to address potential environmental and economic challenges in the future.
Downloads
References
[1] Bezhenar R, Takata H, De with G, et al. Planned release of contaminated water from the Fukushima storage tanks into the ocean: Simulation scenarios of radiological impact for aquatic biota and human from seafood consumption [J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2021, 173: 112969.
[2] Wang M, Tan Z, Liu J, et al. Analyzing the impact of Fukushima nuclear wastewater discharge on seafood trade with gravity model [J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2022, 230: 106302.
[3] Li, J. Analysis of the Impact of Japan’s Nuclear Wastewater Discharge on the Seafood Market in Neighboring Regions [J]. China Fisheries Economics, 2012.
[4] Wei Y, Zhang J, Cao X, et al. Fukushima’s radioactive water threatens coastal groundwater [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2024.
[5] Chun-Chang L, Chi-Ming L, Hui-Chuan H. The impact of a mass rapid transit system on neighborhood housing Prices: An application of Difference-In-Difference and Spatial Econometrics [J]. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 2020, 28 (1): 28 – 40.
[6] Lu, L., Yang, W., & Huang, Z. Study on the Impact of Japan’s Nuclear Wastewater Discharge on China’s Aquatic Product Imports and Exports and Countermeasures [J]. China Business Theory, 2024, 2024 (9): 57 - 61.
[7] Wing C, Dreyer M. Making sense of the Difference-in-Difference design [J]. JAMA Internal Medicine, 2024, 184 (10): 1250.
[8] Caniglia E C, Murray E J. Difference-in-Difference in the Time of Cholera: A Gentle Introduction for Epidemiologists [J]. Current Epidemiology Reports, 2020, 7 (4): 203 – 211.
[9] Imamura N, Katata G, Kajino M, et al. Fogwater deposition of radiocesium in the forested mountains of East Japan during the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident: A key process in regional radioactive contamination [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2020, 224: 117339.
[10] Wakamatsu H, Miyata T. Effects of radioactive safety information on consumer fears of radioactive contamination from oyster products in Japan [J]. Marine Policy, 2021, 126: 104401.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.