Research Progress of Rubber Forest Ecological Restoration Based on CiteSpace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/2xws8356Keywords:
rubber (Hevea brasiliensis), agroforestry rubber forest, ecological restoration, CiteSpace, visualisation analysis.Abstract
Currently, more and more attention is being paid to ecological restoration, and research on ecological restoration of rubber forests is also developing. In this paper, using CiteSpace 6.3.R1 software and bibliometric analysis, the literature in the field of ecological restoration of rubber forests is visualized and analyzed to support the development of ecological restoration of rubber forests and provide guidance for further research. The results show that the most important research priorities and trends in the field of ecological restoration of rubber forests are currently:(1) Community structure and biodiversity of rubber forests and their influencing factors. Particular attention is paid to the diversity of understorey plants and microbial diversity in the soil. (2) Effects of the conversion of tropical rainforests into rubber forests. Particular attention will be paid to the impact on soil physicochemical properties, ecosystem functions, carbon stocks, biomass, etc. (3) Sustainable management of rubber forests: Special attention will be given to agroforestry rubber forests and the role of semi-natural management practices in the restoration of rubber forests. Future research should continue to promote breeding programs, further explore agroforestry rubber systems and improve management programs for rubber plantations, evaluate and implement ecological restoration projects, and integrate research on climate change and ecological restoration of rubber forests.
Downloads
References
[1] Gann G D, McDonald T, Walder B, et al. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration[J]. Restoration ecology, 2019, 27 (S1): S1-S46.
[2] Fischer J, Riechers M, Loos J, et al. Making the UN decade on ecosystem restoration a social-ecological endeavour[J]. Trends in ecology & evolution, 2021, 36(1): 20-28.
[3] Ahrends A, Hollingsworth P M, Ziegler A D, et al. Current trends of rubber plantation expansion may threaten biodiversity and livelihoods[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2015, 34: 48-58.
[4] Singh A K, Liu W, Zakari S, et al. A global review of rubber plantations: Impacts on ecosystem functions, mitigations, future directions, and policies for sustainable cultivation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 796: 148948.
[5] Chen C, Liu W, Wu J, et al. Can intercropping with the cash crop help improve the soil physico-chemical properties of rubber plantations? [J]. Geoderma, 2019, 335: 149-160.
[6] Qiu J. Where the rubber meets the garden: China's leading conservation centre is facing down an onslaught of rubber plantations[J]. Nature, 2009, 457(7227): 246-248.
[7] Garousi F, Shan Z, Ni K, et al. Decreased inorganic N supply capacity and turnover in calcareous soil under degraded rubber plantation in the tropical karst region [J]. Geoderma, 2021, 381: 114754.
[8] Cai X, Chen C, Singh A K, et al. Anthropogenic restoration exhibits more complex and stable microbial co-occurrence patterns than natural restoration in rubber plantations [J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2024, 948: 174935.
[9] Lv W, Zhao X, Wu P, et al. A scientometric analysis of worldwide intercropping research based on web of science database between 1992 and 2020 [J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13 (5): 2430.
[10] Liu C, Yuan Y, Zhou A, et al. Development Trends and Research Frontiers of Preferential Flow in Soil Based on CiteSpace[J]. Water, 2022, 14 (19): 3036.
[11] Zhang Wenjuan, Zhao Huimin, Lu Liangyan. Research Hotspots and Trend Analysis of Agricultural Internet of Things Based on CiteSpace [J/OL]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,1-9 [2024-07-28]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/34.1076.S.20240725.1814.002.html.
[12] Peerawat M, Blaud A, Trap J, et al. Rubber plantation ageing controls soil biodiversity after land conversion from cassava[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2018, 257: 92-102.
[13] Clermont-Dauphin C, Suvannang N, Pongwichian P, et al. Dinitrogen fixation by the legume cover crop Pueraria phaseoloides and transfer of fixed N to Hevea brasiliensis—impact on tree growth and vulnerability to drought[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2016, 217: 79-88.
[14] Panklang P, Thaler P, Thoumazeau A, et al. How 75 years of rubber monocropping affects soil fauna and nematodes as the bioindicators for soil biodiversity quality index [J]. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B—Soil & Plant Science, 2022, 72 (1): 612-622.
[15] Perron T, Kouakou A, Simon C, et al. Logging residues promote rapid restoration of soil health after clear-cutting of rubber plantations at two sites with contrasting soils in Africa[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2022, 816: 151526.
[16] Kouakou A K, Trap J, Diakhaté S, et al. Temporal changes of topsoil nematode communities in rubber plantations in Ivory Coast in response to logging residue management and legumes introduction [J]. Plant and Soil, 2023: 1-16.
[17] Yang Jinyin, Wu Zhixiang, Wei Yaqing, et al. Analysis of undergrowth plant diversity of rubber plantations in Mengla County, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province [J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2024,15 (04): 427-436. DOI: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230136.
[18] Yan S, Chen M, Wen J, et al. Global research trends in cardiac arrest research: a visual analysis of the literature based on CiteSpace[J]. World journal of emergency medicine, 2022, 13 (4): 290.
[19] Wang Qing, Yuan Chuan, Zhang Yafeng, et al. Research progress of the spatial heterogeneity and temporal stability of throughfall based on bibliometric analysis [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2024,29 (10): 315-328. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=u3gpgSR0TKffqgnA1w MjuCLoDKIj5dCWzmcLhZYC3GPYDzvyXAIrnWB6ENXVM2Q7FNAkUDfE1Bp_cs-JtrdjP1uwePs G_bh_2I8YrWYgWXGQH97apOrVJw7zPf5DYXFKt3CSf5nR_ocO9CmSrj77VKWMKcFsDNYtD_Y-5uPzKu5KXfjKi-HumtVBDV0QrSFZ&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
[20] Heepngoen P, Thoumazeau A, Renevier M S, et al. Relationships between physico-chemical, biological and functional approaches for soil quality assessment. A case study along a gradient of disturbance [J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2021, 104: 103300.
[21] Jong Y W, Beirne C, Meunier Q, et al. Expected carbon emissions from a rubber plantation in Central Africa [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 480: 118668.
[22] Li Mingmei, Chen Li, Lan Guoyu, et al. Undergrowth Plant Species Composition and Diversity in Rubber Plantations in Vietnam [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture,2021,41 (10):82-91. https://kns. cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=u3gpgSR0TKdZm1GKyKuhl11ZO30JOlY8cXo1lTddrNJxI7Rnm8appamB7xkObmoLtGN6N7Hso-OdPg97lh_ZoK-9PWfP9NjnVT_4Sws5YFbX5EH1YmM902iIHELMltL CZMeNZ8O5EJE5VHAnoga-Z88Yh3ldOkNEWbvjPvQTfboaYuULbJj59rksH5useTbR&uniplatform= NZKPT&language=CHS
[23] Li Mingmei, Quan Fei, Sun Shuqing, et al. The Effect of Close-to-natural Management on Soil Bacteria in Rubber Plantations [J]. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2021, 50 (05): 81-89. DOI:10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2021.05.012.
[24] Huang Xianhan, Lan Guoyu, Yang Chuan, et al. Understory species composition and shrub-grass species diversity of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantations in Guangdong province [J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2016,47 (11): 1914-1920. doi:10.3969/jissn.2095-1191.2016.11.1914.
[25] Lan Guoyu, Wu Zhixiang, Xie Guishui. Characteristics of plant species diversity of rubber plantation in Hainan Island [J]. Biodiversity Science, 2014, 22(05): 658-666. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstrac t?v=u3gpgSR0TKc2nHO0NLIGP4WOogj6caLW46_m5dyJAuNwmuNKiMwosPNC06ixvlXBahJTDvsziYymqCP5NSIh-3hUk9cjZYcbKcMqYpeuOVX5Pxpc2TEfPmE2z5g7Zu40dMJhmrbxme3w-g-77RX z7wDTi4cg2At3rHUGpa-e4E-SBmct06Y9zFSruaCZi1RN&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
[26] Lu Hongjian, Liu Wenjie, Luo Qingpu. Eco-hydrological effects of litter layer in a mountainous rubber plantation in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2011,30 (10): 2129-2136. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2011.0282.
[27] Li Jingtao, Liu Wenjie, Lu Hongjian. Comparison of water repellency in the tropical rainforest and rubber plantation in Xishuangbanna, SW China [J]. Journal of Yunnan University (Natural Sciences Edition),2010,32(S1):391-398+404. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=u3gpgSR0TKdp30w RKCLa4QjPsNa6iy90s2cvKzhYPBmBgq0Xg2majd88xRwJxsmToM_kBMEuRt5lEFbT1YV09X7kNzk-mqEbVnrt3tZa5BJ5ymb6GXGLDNYQofLUe1Y8wOW9DRJx0Qq82PU4NN9iOgOn9kbtQGtiaxh DFEUPfUZVTLR4d7BJweiYhiS-5K7M&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
[28] Xu Rui, Xie Jiang, Yan Xiangshuai, et al. Comparison on Biomass and Carbon Storage of Rubber Plantation with Other Types of Forest in Xishuangbanna [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(04): 1145-1153. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2021.04.034.
[29] Liu C A, Liang M Y, Nie Y, et al. The conversion of tropical forests to rubber plantations accelerates soil acidification and changes the distribution of soil metal ions in topsoil layers [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 696: 134082.
[30] Furoc-Paelmo R, Cosico R S A, Cabahug R E D, et al. Farmers’ perception on the sustainability of as a climate change adaptation strategy in agusan agusan del sur and north cotobato, Philippines [J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 2018.
[31] Zhou Huiping, Yan Xiangshuai, Zhang Haidong, et al. Species Diversity of Understorey Vegetation in Rubber Plantations in Xishuangbanna [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2012,33 (08): 1444-1449. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2012.08.022.
[32] Liu Qiang, Bi Hua, Yu Longshi, et al. REFORMING RUBBER FARM WITH ECOLOGICAL TRADES TO REALIZE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT [J]. Tropical Geography, 2003, (03): 241-245. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=u3gpgSR0TKdCmLp5oFFAdtbU-rlHPT3eKracaLXKJK vaqO48pW7rqBCMwQ2Yusa6z4c-3ztai3mMhkvkfjmecign_T3bWx8Xcz8rai1C27_m6VeZjhiaXqTTP _6cgqa72hwqGcMAc-PX56YX7a2VsN8Pq16PwFLGBi47cf6Xdi6tQ1-xwphtEAFim5accD07&unip latform=NZKPT&language=CHS
[33] Zheng G, Li S, Yang X. Spider diversity in canopies of Xishuangbanna rainforest (China) indicates an alarming juggernaut effect of rubber plantations [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2015, 338: 200-207.
[34] Zou X, Zhu X, Zhu P, et al. Soil quality assessment of different Hevea brasiliensis plantations in tropical China [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 285: 112147.
[35] Li X A, Ge T D, Chen Z, et al. Enhancement of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks by abiotic and microbial pathways in three rubber‐based agroforestry systems in Southwest China [J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2020, 31 (16): 2507-2515.
[36] Liu W G, Zhang J Q, Yan Y, et al. Encouraging the reconversion of rubber plantations by developing a combined payment system [J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2023, 43: e02415.
[37] Ji Y, Qiao D, Wei K, et al. Is green eco-friendly? How cognitive biases affect residents’ willingness to participate in natural rubber plantation ecological restoration programs in Hainan, China [J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2023, 46: e02568.
[38] Qiao D, Li W, Zhang D, et al. How do You want to restore?--assessing the public preferences and social benefits of ecological restoration for natural rubber plantation in China [J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, 10: 823778.
[39] Huang I Y, James K, Thamthanakoon N, et al. Economic outcomes of rubber-based agroforestry systems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis [J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2023, 97 (3): 335-354.
[40] Kennedy S F, Leimona B, Yi Z F. Making a green rubber stamp: emerging dynamics of natural rubber eco-certification [J]. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 2017, 13 (1): 100-115.
[41] Suryanarayanan T S, Azevedo J L. From forest to plantation: a brief history of the rubber tree [J]. Indian Journal of History of Science, 2023, 58 (1): 74-78.
[42] Guillaume T, Kotowska M M, Hertel D, et al. Carbon costs and benefits of Indonesian rainforest conversion to plantations [J]. Nature communications, 2018, 9 (1): 2388.
[43] PENOT, E., LE GUEN, A., CHEVREUX, A., et al. Options agronomiques et socio-économiques pour les cultures intercalaires à base d’hévéa au Sri Lanka: une analyse prospective dans les régions de Moneragala et d’Ampara. BOIS & FORETS DES TROPIQUES, 2023, 356, 43–65. https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2023.356.a37045
[44] Gan Y, Xu T, Xu N R, et al. How environmental awareness and knowledge affect urban residents’ willingness to participate in rubber plantation ecological restoration programs: evidence from Hainan, China [J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13 (4): 1852.
[45] Zou R, Sultan H, Muse Muhamed S, et al. Sustainable integration of rubber plantations within agroforestry systems in China: current research and future directions. Plant Sci. Today [Internet]. 2024 Jul. 25 [cited 2024 Sep. 21];11 (3).
[46] Simonson W D, Miller E, Jones A, et al. Enhancing climate change resilience of ecological restoration—A framework for action [J]. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 2021, 19 (3): 300-310.
[47] Zhang W, Xu D. Benefits evaluation of ecological restoration projects based on value realization of ecological products [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 352: 120139.
[48] Tian H, Cao C, Chen W, et al. Response of vegetation activity dynamic to climatic change and ecological restoration programs in Inner Mongolia from 2000 to 2012[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2015, 82: 276-289.
[49] Oktavia F, Agustina D S. Progress of rubber breeding program to support agroforestry system in Indonesia [C]//E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2021, 305: 03006.
[50] Rosa J R B F, Mantello C C, Garcia D, et al. QTL detection for growth and latex production in a full-sib rubber tree population cultivated under suboptimal climate conditions [J]. BMC plant biology, 2018, 18: 1-16.
[51] Cahyo A N, Murti R H, Putra E T S, et al. Screening and QTLs detection for drought factor index trait in rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Müll. Arg.) [J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2022, 190: 115894.
[52] Cahyo A N, Dong Y, Taryono, et al. Rubber-based agroforestry systems associated with food crops: A solution for sustainable rubber and food production? [J]. Agriculture, 2024, 14 (7): 1038.
[53] Wang Jingyi, Gan Shanshan, Jia Caihong, et al. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 Technology in Tropical Crops Breeding [J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2024,25 (03): 312-322. DOI:10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20231010001.
[54] Souza L M, Francisco F R, Gonçalves P S, et al. Genomic selection in rubber tree breeding: a comparison of models and methods for managing G× E interactions [J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2019, 10: 1353.
[55] Huang J, Pan J, Zhou L, et al. An improved double-row rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantation system increases land use efficiency by allowing intercropping with yam bean, common bean, soybean, peanut, and coffee: A 17-year case study on Hainan Island, China [J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2020, 263: 121493.
[56] Huang I Y, James K, Thamthanakoon N, et al. Economic outcomes of rubber-based agroforestry systems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis [J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2023, 97 (3): 335-354.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
