Risk Assessment and Monitoring Methods for Geologic Sequestration of CO2 in the Saline Aquifer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/6tkygm56Keywords:
CCUS, saline aquifer, risk assessment, monitoring, geological storage, CO2.Abstract
Geological sequestration of CO2 is considered to be the most effective measure to realize long-term CO2 emission reduction, which is the key to influence the progress of carbon neutralization. In recent years, CO2 storage in the saline aquifer has been widely utilized in many countries as it is one of the most effective ways of carbon sequestration. This paper first summarizes the geological storage mechanism of CO2 in the saline aquifer as tectonic storage, capillary storage, adsorption storage, dissolution storage and mineral storage, and then considers the criteria for selecting the site of CO2 in the saline aquifer in terms of technology, safety and economy. During the sequestration process, CO2 may leak from wellbores, caprock, and fractures, and to cope with these scenarios, risk assessments are often conducted using the Delphi method, brainstorming method, risk checklist method, SWOT technique, and FEP method, among others. When targeting complex projects, the combined use of these methods can effectively improve the comprehensiveness and accuracy of risk identification, laying the foundation for subsequent risk assessment and the development of countermeasures. In order to ensure that CO2 can be safely stored in the ground for a long time, it is necessary to implement different monitoring methods according to different purposes, which can be generally divided into three categories: CO2 environmental monitoring, CO2 safety monitoring and CO2 transportation monitoring. CO2 environmental monitoring can be divided into the atmosphere, the near-surface and the shallow stratum in terms of vertical spatial stratum distribution. The shallow stratum environmental detection technology is more mature, but due to the meteorological and topographical impact on the accuracy of atmospheric and near-surface environmental monitoring technology, generally using a combination of multi-technology for monitoring. CO2 leakage caused by easy to cause harm, this time the use of CO2 safety monitoring, is divided into surface deformation, stratigraphic deformation, ground stress, wellbore integrity and wellbore corrosion. We also use seismic, logging and geochemical methods to monitor CO2 transportation.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhang Guangqi, Xu Yubing, Liu Zengqi, Xu Zhen, Wang Yiwei, Sun Qiang, Research Progress on CO2 Geological Storage Technology, Modern Chemical Research, 2024, (17): 41-43.
[2] MA Xinrui, LIANG Jie, LI Qing, YUAN Yong, CHEN Jianwen, LUO Di, ZHAO Hualin, SONG Peng, Progress and prospects of CO2 geological storage in saline aquifer, Marine Geology Frontiers, 2024, 40(10): 1-18.
[3] BAI Yunyun, SHI Yangyang, LU Meijuan, LIANG Ying, Research Progress of CO2 Geological Storage Leakage Path and Monitoring Method under Dual Carbon Targets, JOURNAL OF YULIN UNIVERSITY, 2021, 31 (06): 43-46.
[4] Li Ke, Han Xiaojun, Zhang Xiaobin, Liang Bo, Hu Feng, Wang Qingchuan, Sun Jian, and Wang Songting, Evaluating the key controls on CO2 geologic storage site, Natural Gas Exploration And Development, 2024, 47 (05): 95-102.
[5] Wang Zhanpeng, Liu Qi, Ye Hang, Zhang Min, Liu Shuangxing, Weng Yibin, research progress on CO2 geological storage leakage and monitoring, Environmental Engineering, 2023, 41 (10): 69-81.
[6] VIALLE S, DRUHAN J L, MAHER K. Multi-phaseflow simulation of CO, leakage through a fractured caprock in responseto mitigation strategies, International Journal of GreenhouseGas Control, 2016, 44:11-25.
[7] CIHAN A, BIRKHOLZER J T, ZHOU Q. Pressure buildup and brine migration during CO2 storage in multilayered aquifers. Groundwater, 2013, 51(2):252-267.
[8] Jing Meng, Li Qi, Liu Guizhen, Xu Xiaoyi1, and CO2 Geological Storage Risk Identification: Methods and Application, Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2024, (10): 2719-2728.
[9] Wang Xaoqiao, Ma Denglong, Xia Fengshe, Zhang Xiaoming, Wang Yu,Mao Weigao, Research Progress on Leakage Monitoring Technology for CO, Storage, Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2020, 27 (02): 23-34.
[10] Yang Hui, Fan Huaiwei, Wang Wenfeng, Zhang Yunhui, Ju Wei, Qin Yong, Air-Ground iInteg Rated Monitoring Method of Leakage Risk During Geological Carbon Sequestration, Journal of Engineering Geology, 2023, 31 (04): 1461-1473.
[11] Xu Liang, Cheng Gang, Zhu Honghu, Research Review of Landslide Monitoring Methods Based on Integration of Space-Air-Ground-Interior, Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58 (09): 98-111.
[12] DENG Lizheng, YUAN Hongyong, ZHANG Mingzhi, CHEN Jianguo, Research progress on landslide deformation monitoringand early warning technology , Tsinghua Univ(Sci & Technol) 2023, 63 (06): 849-864.
[13] Lu Yi, Song Zezhuo, Liu Jin, Bu Fan, Qi Chang qing, Land subsidence monitoring and deformation analysis ofTongzhou Bay area based on DFOS, Journal of Hohai University(Natural Sclence), 2023, 51 (02): 81-88.
[14] Zhang Yuehua, Liu Yan, Lv Qingtian, Chen Zhaoxi, Yan Jiayong, Research progress and application prospect of geophysical monitoring technology in the carbon dioxide geological storage, Geology in China, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1167.P.20240527.1112.002
[15] ZHANG Qi, CUYongjun, BU Xuepeng, CHEN Qiang, Coal Combined Oil and Coal Chemical Industry, Northwest Coal, 2011, 9 (02): 77-82.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







