A Study on the Dynamic Weight-Driven AHP-NSGA-II Framework for High-Dimensional Multi-Objective Optimization

Authors

  • Yangke Deng
  • Yingxin Cheng
  • Jinyi Gong
  • Yu Xia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/47088e24

Keywords:

multi-objective optimization, complex systems, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II), fusion technology.

Abstract

This paper investigates an efficient optimization framework for complex systems through the synergistic integration of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II). The proposed methodology addresses multi-criteria decision-making challenges by systematically resolving competing priorities while maintaining solution quality. AHP is leveraged to derive objective weights through structured pairwise comparisons, while NSGA-II identifies Pareto-optimal solutions that optimize system-wide performance metrics. Computational experiments reveal that the hybrid approach achieves superior optimization outcomes with enhanced operational efficiency compared to conventional optimization techniques, particularly in scenarios requiring trade-off analysis between divergent objectives. The framework demonstrates versatility across diverse application contexts including industrial process design, logistics network configuration, and infrastructure development planning. Key innovations include a dynamic weight adjustment mechanism and an adaptive fitness evaluation process that collectively improve solution convergence characteristics and decision space exploration capabilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Abdelwaheb A ,Tariq A ,Sinda S , et al.Re-evaluation of an operating hazardous landfill site considering the conflict with neighboring inhabitants by multi-criteria decision[J].Journal of Mountain Science,2025,22(03):1001-1014..

[2] RODRIGO-COMINO J .Soil resilience assessment using soil profile descriptions and Analytic Hierarchy Process in Mediterranean mountains considering diverse fire occurrences[J].Journal of Mountain Science,2024,21(08):2517-2532.

[3] Zheng Xueqin, Yao Yiping. Multi-target capacity configuration optimization method for photovoltaic electric vehicle charging stations considering the impact of V2G (English) [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2021, 28 (02): 481-493.

[4] Li Y ,Liu X ,Hu P , et al.Multi-stage and multi-objective optimization of anti-typhoon evacuation strategy for riser with new hang-off system[J].Petroleum Science,2025,22(01):457-471.

[5] Zhang J ,Yu Y ,Zhuang Q , et al.Machine learning approaches for designing polybenzoxazines with balanced thermal stability and dielectric properties[J/OL].Science China Chemistry,1-12.

[6] Deng Xue,Li Jiaming,Zeng Haojian,et al.Analysis of weight calculation method of hierarchical analysis and its application[J].Practice and Understanding of Mathematics,2012,42(07):93-100.

[7] CHEN Xiaoqing, HOU Zhongxi, GUO Liangmin, et al.An improved multi-objective genetic algorithm based on NSGA-II[J].Computer Applications,2006,(10):2453-2456.

[8] FABIANEK P, WILL C, WOLFF S, MADLENER R. Green and regional? A multi-criteria assessment framework for the provision of green electricity for electric vehicles in Germany [J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2020, 87: 102504.

[9] Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182-197.

[10] Approximation Guarantees for the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II)[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2024.

Downloads

Published

05-07-2025

How to Cite

Deng, Y., Cheng, Y., Gong, J., & Xia, Y. (2025). A Study on the Dynamic Weight-Driven AHP-NSGA-II Framework for High-Dimensional Multi-Objective Optimization. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 145, 338-348. https://doi.org/10.54097/47088e24