Human Activity Recognition Based on Machine Learning and Smartphone Sensors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/bse2rn10Keywords:
Human Activity Recognition, Smartphone Sensors, Machine Learning.Abstract
In recent years, the importance of Human Activity Recognition (HAR) technology has continued to grow. This study utilizes smartphone-embedded Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) to collect real-world accelerometer and gyroscope data, constructing a multi-dimensional activity analysis framework. Through systematic evaluation of time-domain, frequency-domain, and time-frequency domain feature extraction methods, combined with SMOTE data balancing and PCA dimensionality reduction techniques, a hierarchical classification architecture was designed. This framework integrates machine learning models including logistic regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, XGBoost, and KNN. The results demonstrate differentiated characteristics of classifiers in activity recognition tasks. By dynamically selecting classifier combinations adapted to different activity features, the system achieves flexible optimization of classification strategies. Validation reveals that the integration of time-frequency domain features with dimensionality reduction effectively enhances computational efficiency. The proposed hierarchical framework provides technical support for lightweight HAR systems on smartphone platforms, with its multi-feature domain fusion strategy being extendable to daily activity monitoring and health assessment scenarios. This research offers methodological references for human behavior understanding in wearable devices, emphasizing the critical role of feature engineering and classifier co-optimization in practical applications.
Downloads
References
[1] Straczkiewicz M, James P, Onnela J P. A systematic review of smartphone-based human activity recognition methods for health research[J]. NPJ Digital Medicine, 2021, 4(1): 148.
[2] Gao G, Li Z, Huan Z, et al. Human behavior recognition model based on feature and classifier selection[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(23): 7791.
[3] Demrozi F, Pravadelli G, Bihorac A, et al. Human activity recognition using inertial, physiological and environmental sensors: A comprehensive survey[J]. IEEE access, 2020, 8: 210816-210836.
[4] Wang X, Wang X, Lv T, et al. HARNAS: Human activity recognition based on automatic neural architecture search using evolutionary algorithms[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(20): 6927.
[5] Gao G, Li Z, Huan Z, et al. Human behavior recognition model based on feature and classifier selection[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(23): 7791.
[6] Sun Z, Ke Q, Rahmani H, et al. Human action recognition from various data modalities: A review[J]. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2022, 45(3): 3200-3225.
[7] Ermes M, Pärkkä J, Mäntyjärvi J, et al. Detection of daily activities and sports with wearable sensors in controlled and uncontrolled conditions[J]. IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine, 2008, 12(1): 20-26.
[8] Wang Y, Wu C, Zheng K, et al. Improving reliability: User authentication on smartphones using keystroke biometrics[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 26218-26228.
[9] Wang Y, Wu C, Zheng K, et al. Improving reliability: User authentication on smartphones using keystroke biometrics[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 26218-26228.
[10] Gupta S. Deep learning based human activity recognition (HAR) using wearable sensor data[J]. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2021, 1(2): 100046.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







