Research on production process decision model based on Monte Carlo simulation and multi-objective optimization

Authors

  • Lipeng Cao
  • Yibo Wang
  • Qianwen Zhangsun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/031kje03

Keywords:

Monte Carlo Simulation, Multi-objective Optimization, Dynamic Adjustment, Sampling Inspection, Optimized Production Decision-making.

Abstract

This study proposes a production decision framework integrating Monte Carlo simulation and multi-objective optimization to optimize electronics manufacturing processes. Through systematic evaluation of 16 strategy combinations, we identify strategies 1100 and 1101 as optimal solutions. Strategy 1100 implements component-level inspections for both parts, skips product testing, and discards defective products, achieving an 8% market defect rate with 18.7% cost reduction. Strategy 1101 maintains identical inspections but incorporates disassembly of defective products, reducing market defects to 5% at a 14.5% cost increase relative to 1100. A dynamic weighted scoring function adaptively balances profit maximization, defect rate control, and cost constraints, validated through 10,000-cycle probabilistic simulations. These strategies reduce downstream defect propagation by 61-63% compared to terminal inspection approaches. Sensitivity analysis confirms component defect rates dominate system performance with a normalized index of 0.71, while maintaining solution stability within ±2% parameter variations. Benchmark comparisons demonstrate 9-14% improvement in profit-cost ratios over traditional methods. The framework enables manufacturers to strategically select between cost-driven 1100 and quality-driven 1101 based on market requirements, establishing an equilibrium between preventive quality assurance and operational efficiency. This approach provides actionable insights for industrial decision-making in stochastic production environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chu Binchi. Application of supply chain management in procurement cost control in the electronics industry [J]. China Tendering, 2024, (11): 83-85.

[2] Wang Yuxuan. Reliability and cost analysis of power system under high wind power penetration based on sequential Monte Carlo method [J]. Shanxi Electric Power, 2024, (05): 14-17.

[3] Ye Zhiwei, Huang Yaolong, Meng Hongwei, et al. Monte Carlo preview analysis of thermal energy extraction under the trend of permeability decrease in hot dry rock reservoirs [J/OL]. Journal of Coal Society, 1-14 [2024-12-04].

[4] Kang Xinlin, Sun Shengxiang, Cheng Huijiao, et al. Analysis of risk assessment method of equipment maintenance project based on Monte Carlo simulation [J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2024, 44 (08): 98-102.

[5] Tian Nianjie, Su Xiangrui, Li Tengmu, et al. Multi-objective optimization scheduling considering FACTS equipment and renewable energy [J/OL]. Power System and Acta Automatica Sinica, 1-11[2024-12-04].

[6] Shu Hui, Zeng Yuqing. Research on flexible job shop rescheduling under machine failure disturbance [J]. Light Industry Science and Technology, 2024, 40(05):57-60+69.

[7] Zhou Tian. Analysis of non-ergodic abnormal dynamic model and Monte Carlo simulation algorithm under complex environment [D]. Lanzhou University, 2022.

[8] Du Hongyu, Zhang Hongyu, Chen Bo, et al. Considering multiple demand response Optimization of operation mechanism and control strategy of virtual power plant based on resource[J]. New Technology of Electrical Engineering and Power, 2023, 42(07):77-86.

[9] Chen Chao, Yan Yiqun, Xing Xue. Research on application of exhaustive method in manufacturing production management [J]. Public Investment Guide, 2019, (12):99.

[10] Wang Yinfang. Logistics cost control strategy and financial benefit analysis in supply chain [J]. Financial Management, 2024, (11):72-74.

Downloads

Published

02-07-2025

How to Cite

Cao, L., Wang, Y., & Zhangsun, Q. (2025). Research on production process decision model based on Monte Carlo simulation and multi-objective optimization. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 146, 120-126. https://doi.org/10.54097/031kje03