Optimal Planting Strategy for Crops Based on Multi-objective Optimization Algorithm

Authors

  • Peiyao Li
  • Dantong Zhang
  • Yilin Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/wxd2hf94

Keywords:

Multi-objective Optimization, Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II, Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition.

Abstract

The sustainable development of rural economy has always been the focus of national and local governments. Under the limited cultivated land resources, the development of organic planting industry according to local conditions can not only improve the utilization rate of land, but also promote the stable growth of rural economy. Based on the data of the American College Students Mathematical Modeling Competition, this paper uses NSGA-II and MOEA/D model to solve the optimal planting scheme and maximum profit of farmers under different sales situations when crop overcapacity in 2024-2030. In addition, this paper also uses Robust NSGA-II algorithm to obtain the optimal planting plan and maximum profit after considering the uncertainty of expected sales volume, yield per mu, planting cost and selling price of crops, which provides theoretical reference for realizing the reasonable allocation of agricultural resources and increasing farmers' income. Finally, this study found that, the best-planting scheme solved by Robust NSGA-II algorithm has higher profit than NSGA-II algorithm and MOEA/D algorithm, while algorithms in uncertain situations are more realistic, indicating that Robust NSGA-II algorithm can guide farmers' crop planting plan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zhao J, Luo Q, Deng H, et al. Opportunities and challenges of sustainable agricultural development in China[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2008, 363(1492): 893-904.

[2] Liu Tao A Brief Discussion on Strategies for Optimizing Crop Planting [J] Agricultural Technology and Information, 2021, (22): 73-74.

[3] Li M, Zhou Y, Wang Y, et al. An ecological footprint approach for cropland use sustainability based on multi-objective optimization modelling [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 273: 111147.

[4] Jain S, Ramesh D, Bhattacharya D. A multi-objective algorithm for crop pattern optimization in agriculture [J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2021, 112: 107772.

[5] Palupi I, Wahyudi B A, Sa’Adah S. Optimization of Crops Allocation Planning in Cianjur Involving Water Cost Constraints Using Genetic Algorithm[C]//2021 9th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT). IEEE, 2021: 600-605.

[6] Yang G, Li X, Huo L, et al. A solving approach for fuzzy multi-objective linear fractional programming and application to an agricultural planting structure optimization problem [J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2020, 141: 110352.

[7] Ma H, Zhang Y, Sun S, et al. A comprehensive survey on NSGA-II for multi-objective optimization and applications [J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023, 56(12): 15217-15270.

[8] Zhang Y, Li X, Liu Y. Sustainable agricultural development through precision farming: A review [J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(12): 6897.

[9] Chen L, Wang H, Zhang Q. Multi-objective optimization for agricultural water management using a hybrid algorithm [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 609: 127756.

[10] Gómez C, García M. Climate change adaptation in agriculture: A multi-objective optimization approach [J]. Agricultural Systems, 2023, 199: 103402.

[11] Wang S, Li Y, Zhang D. Machine learning-based multi-objective optimization for agricultural production planning [J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2024, 212: 107456.

[12] Wang Q, Gu Q, Chen L, et al. A MOEA/D with global and local cooperative optimization for complicated bi-objective optimization problems [J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2023, 137: 110162.

Downloads

Published

02-07-2025

How to Cite

Li, P., Zhang, D., & Chen, Y. (2025). Optimal Planting Strategy for Crops Based on Multi-objective Optimization Algorithm. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 146, 70-76. https://doi.org/10.54097/wxd2hf94