Structural Performance and Failure Probability Analysis of Steel Truss Bridges

Authors

  • Jia Gao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fxwsnx69

Keywords:

Truss Carlo, probability analysis.

Abstract

Study presents a comprehensive analysis of the structural performance and failure probability of a steel truss pedestrian bridge. The load transfer mechanism was analyzed under dead and live loads, including bridge self-weight (15 kN/m), deck weight (15 kN/m), crowd load (27 kN/m), and vehicle load (11 kN/m). Stability analysis was conducted using joint and section methods, validated through finite element software. A probabilistic framework employing Monte Carlo simulation (1,000 samples) evaluated failure risks, considering lognormal-distributed nodal forces (mean=5.378 kN, COV=0.3) and rod diameters (mean=0.1 m, COV=0.02). The results obtained from this analysis revealed a system-level failure probability of 15%, which was attributed to series-structure dependency. This analysis also highlighted the sensitivity of the system to material variability and sample size. The implementation of mitigation strategies, encompassing material substitution (Q235 steel) and variance reduction techniques, led to a substantial reduction in failure probability to 2%. This research underscores the necessity of probabilistic methods in enhancing urban bridge safety and reliability, aligning with advancements in structural engineering and risk management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Li, W.J. Research on load combination method of super-large span public-railway suspension bridge[D]. Dalian University of Technology, 2021.

[2] Liu, S.N. et al. Probability distribution of yield strength of austenitic stainless steel at ultra-low temperature[J]. Journal of Wuhan Engineering Vocational and Technical College, 2019, 31(01): 1–5.

[3] Xie, X., Li, H. Probabilistic analysis of mechanical properties of SiC_f/SiC composites considering internal damage randomness[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Engineering, 2025: 1–11.

[4] Zhao, C. Research on the coupled probabilistic modeling method of stratigraphic type and spatial distribution of geotechnical parameters[D]. China University of Geosciences, 2022.

[5] GB/T 7714-2015. Information and documentation—Rules for bibliographic references and citations to information resources[S].

[6] Zhang, L., Wang, Y. Dynamic response analysis of steel truss bridges under traffic-induced vibrations[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2020, 25(4): 04020012.

[7] Wang, H., Li, Z. Variability control in steel manufacturing and its impact on structural performance[J]. Materials & Design, 2019, 178: 107861.

[8] Feng, X., & Liu, M. Data-driven probabilistic assessment of steel truss bridges using structural health monitoring[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2023, 172: 108952.

[9] Chen, Q., Xu, J. Comparative study of Weibull and lognormal distributions in structural reliability analysis[J]. Structural Safety, 2021, 89: 102045.

[10] Gupta, A., & Kumar, P. Monte Carlo simulation for failure probability assessment in large-scale infrastructure: A case study of suspension bridges[J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 254: 113876.

Downloads

Published

22-07-2025

How to Cite

Gao, J. (2025). Structural Performance and Failure Probability Analysis of Steel Truss Bridges. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 148, 40-48. https://doi.org/10.54097/fxwsnx69