Autonomous Navigation Technology for Robots and Its Applications in Intelligent Transportation and Industrial Fields
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hjbqpn98Keywords:
LiDAR, Stereo Cameras; RGB Cameras; SLAM; Path Planning; Autonomous Systems.Abstract
This paper delves into the pivotal role of LiDAR, stereo cameras, RGB cameras, and Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) in enhancing environmental perception for autonomous systems. It elucidates the fundamental principles underlying these technologies and their critical applications in autonomous driving and robotics. The paper underscores how LiDAR provides high-resolution 3D maps crucial for obstacle detection and collision avoidance, while stereo cameras leverage parallax to measure depth, facilitating navigation and obstacle detection in robotics and autonomous vehicles. RGB cameras, though lacking direct depth measurement, are invaluable for colour-based object recognition and tracking. SLAM is highlighted for its ability to construct maps of unknown environments in real-time, essential for autonomous navigation in dynamic settings. The paper also discusses path planning technologies such as the Dynamic Window Approach (DWA), A*, and Rapidly Exploring Random Tree (RRT), which are integral to the navigation capabilities of autonomous systems. These technologies collectively contribute to the advancement of intelligent transportation, industrial automation, and logistics by improving the safety, accuracy, and efficiency of autonomous operations.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhang, J., & Singh, S. Solid-State LiDAR for Autonomous Vehicles: A Review.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2015,31(3),598-609
[2] Yoo, H., et al. Solid-State LiDAR for Autonomous Vehicles: A Review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2022, 22(4), 2920-2935.
[3] Guo, C., et al. Robust Place Recognition Using 3D LiDAR in Challenging Weather. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2019, 66(12), 9889-9901.
[4] Wolcott, R. W., & Eustice, R. M. Visual localization within LiDAR maps for automated urban driving. IEEE/RSJ IROS, 2017, 176-183.
[5] Geiger, A., Lenz, P. & Urtasun, R. Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012, 3354-3361..
[6] Tian, Y., Zhang, H., Fu, Y. & Xu, C. Monocular depth estimation with self-supervised learning. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2020, 29, 6432-6442.
[7] Chen, X., Wang, H., Luo, Y. & Li, K. Monocular visual odometry for road vehicles. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2016, 1366-1371.
[8] Mur-Artal, R., Montiel, J. M. M. & Tardós, J. D. ORB-SLAM: A versatile and accurate monocular SLAM system. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2015, 31(5), 1147-1163.
[9] Godard, C., Mac Aodha, O. & Brostow, G. J. Unsupervised monocular depth estimation with left-right consistency. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017, 6602-6611.
[10] Scharstein, D. & Szeliski, R. A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2002, 24(7), 807-824.
[11] Hirschmüller, H. Stereo processing by semiglobal matching and mutual information. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2008, 30(2), 328-341.
[12] Geiger, A., Lenz, P. & Urtasun, R. Vision meets robotics: The KITTI dataset. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2013, 32(11), 1231-1237.
[13] Yamaguchi, K., McAllester, D. & Urtasun, R. Efficient joint segmentation, occlusion labeling, stereo and flow estimation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2014, 36(1), 157-171.
[14] Kendall, A., Martirosyan, H., Dasgupta, S. & Henry, P. End-to-end learning of geometry and context for deep stereo regression. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2017, 66-75.
[15] Malvar, H. S., He, L. & Cutler, R. High-quality linear interpolation for demosaicing of Bayer-patterned colour images. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2004, 3, 485-488.
[16] Everingham, M., Eslami, S. M. A., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J. & Zisserman, A. The Pascal Visual Object Classes Challenge: A Retrospective. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2015, 111(1), 98-136.
[17] Gupta, S., Girshick, R., Arbeláez, P. & Malik, J. Learning rich features from RGB-D images for object detection and segmentation. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2014, 345-360.
[18] Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R. & Sun, J. Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2015, 39(6), 1137-1149.
[19] Petschnigg, G., Szeliski, R., Agrawala, M., Cohen, M., Hoppe, H. & Toyama, K. Digital photography with flash and no-flash image pairs. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 2004, 23(3), 664-672.
[20] Chen, L.-C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F. & Adam, H. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.02611, 2017.
[21] Grisetti, G., Kümmerle, R., Stachniss, C. & Burgard, W. A tutorial on graph-based SLAM. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 2010, 2(4), 31-43.
[22] Qin, T., Li, P. & Shen, S. VINS-Mono: A robust and versatile monocular visual-inertial state estimator. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2018, 34(4), 1004-1020.
[23] Kümmerle, R., Grisetti, G., Strasdat, H., Konolige, K. & Burgard, W. g2o: A general framework for graph optimization. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011, 3607-3613.
[24] Li, X., Belaroussi, R. & Gruyer, D. Deep learning for visual SLAM: A survey. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2020, 7(3), 925-937.
[25] Fox, D., Burgard, W. & Thrun, S. The dynamic window approach to collision avoidance. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 1997, 4(1), 23-33.
[26] Brock, O. & Khatib, O. High-speed navigation using the global dynamic window approach. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 1999, 1, 341-346.
[27] Ulrich, I. & Borenstein, J. VFH+: Reliable obstacle avoidance for fast mobile robots. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2000, 2, 1572-1577.
[28] Macenski, S., Martín-Martín, R., Yang, C. & Sucan, I. On the performance of DWA-based path planning for mobile robot navigation. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2020, 3299-3306.
[29] Kästner, L., Buiyan, T., Zhao, X. & Jiao, J. Dynamic window approach for warehouse automation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2021, 6(2), 1129-1136.
[30] Chen, Y., Liu, S., Shen, X. & Jia, Y. Enhanced DWA with deep reinforcement learning for dynamic environments. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2022, 69(5), 4921-4930.
[31] Hart, P. E., Nilsson, N. J. & Raphael, B. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 1968, 4(2), 100-107.
[32] Pearl, J. Heuristics: Intelligent search strategies for computer problem solving. Addison-Wesley, 1984.
[33] Rabin, S. (Ed.). Game AI Pro: Collected wisdom of game AI professionals. CRC Press, 2014.
[34] Zeng, W., & Church, R. L. (2009). Finding shortest paths on real road networks: The case for A*. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23(4), 531–543.
[35] Goldberg, A. V. & Harrelson, C. Computing the shortest path: A* search meets graph theory. Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2005, 156-165.
[36] LaValle, S. M. Rapidly-exploring random trees: A new tool for path planning. Iowa State University Technical Report TR 98-11, 1998.
[37] Kuffner, J. J. & LaValle, S. M. RRT-connect: An efficient approach to single-query path planning. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2000, 995-1001.
[38] Karaman, S. & Frazzoli, E. Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2011, 30(7), 846-894.
[39] Gammell, J. D., Srinivasa, S. S. & Barfoot, T. D. Informed RRT*: Optimal sampling-based path planning focused via direct sampling of an admissible ellipsoidal heuristic. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2014, 2997-3004.
[40] LaValle, S. M. & Kuffner, J. J. Randomized kinodynamic planning. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2001, 20(5), 378-400.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







