An Improved Hybrid A* for Efficient Path Planning in Simple Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hd8h5559Keywords:
Robot; path-planning; Hybrid A*; Improved Hybrid A*; Maze solving.Abstract
Path planning plays an essential role in many fields such as autonomous navigation, robot obstacle avoidance, and route optimization. Despite Hybrid A* being able to handle non-holonomic constraints and generating smoother paths than classical A*, it still suffers from computational efficiency issues, especially in relatively simple environments. By modifying parameters, this paper proposes an Improved Hybrid A* algorithm, which, while maintaining the kinematic feasibility of Hybrid A*, reduces the analytic expansion intervals, interpolation distances, and costs of switching direction. These parameters are tuned towards the reduction of reliance on heuristics and faster computation in relatively simple maze environments. The experimental results in maze environments with varying complexities demonstrate that, compared to the traditional Hybrid A* algorithm, the proposed Improved Hybrid A* algorithm can significantly enhance computing efficiency, particularly in less complex environments. This has shown that the morphology approach improves performance and is thus more suitable for autonomous navigation, where computational efficiency is important.
Downloads
References
[1] Van den Berg, Jur, et al. “Anytime Nonparametric A*.” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 4 Aug. 2011, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 105–111.
[2] Sturtevant, Nathan, and Robert Geisberger. “A Comparison of High-Level Approaches for Speeding up Pathfinding.” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, 10 Oct. 2010, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 76–82, .
[3] Kolivand, Hoshang, and Mohd Shahrizal Sunar. “Survey of Shadow Volume Algorithms in Computer Graphics.” IETE Technical Review, 2013, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 38.
[4] Foead, Daniel, et al. “A Systematic Literature Review of A* Pathfinding.” Procedia Computer Science, 2021, vol. 179, pp. 507–514.
[5] H. Sang, Y. You, X. Sun, Y. Zhou, and F. Liu, “The hybrid path planning algorithm based on improved A* and artificial potential field for unmanned surface vehicle formations,” Ocean Engineering, Mar. 2021, vol. 223, p. 108709.
[6] B. B. K. Ayawli, R. Chellali, A. Y. Appiah, and F. Kyeremeh, “An Overview of Nature-Inspired, Conventional, and Hybrid Methods of Autonomous Vehicle Path Planning,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, Jul. 2018, vol. 2018, pp. 1–27.
[7] N. Wang and H. Xu, “Dynamics-Constrained Global-Local Hybrid Path Planning of an Autonomous Surface Vehicle,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Apr. 2020, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 6928–6942.
[8] U. Orozco-Rosas, K. Picos, and O. Montiel, “Hybrid Path Planning Algorithm Based on Membrane Pseudo-Bacterial Potential Field for Autonomous Mobile Robots,” IEEE Access, 2019, vol. 7, pp. 156787–156803.
[9] J. Li, G. Deng, C. Luo, Q. Lin, Q. Yan, and Z. Ming, “A Hybrid Path Planning Method in Unmanned Air/Ground Vehicle (UAV/UGV) Cooperative Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Dec. 2016, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 9585–9596.
[10] Y. Lin and Srikanth Saripalli, “Path planning using 3D Dubins Curve for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles,” May 201.
[11] T. Fraichard and A. Scheuer, “From Reeds and Shepp’s to Continuous-Curvature Paths,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Dec. 2004, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1025–1035.
[12] J.-J. Kim and J.-J. Lee, “Trajectory Optimization With Particle Swarm Optimization for Manipulator Motion Planning,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Jun. 2015, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 620–631.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







