Advances in Electrode Materials for Bio-electrochemical Systems:A Comprehensive Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/cemh7f49Keywords:
Microbial fuel cells, Microbial electrolysis cells, Electrode materials.Abstract
This article reviews the latest research progress on electrode materials in bio-electrochemical systems (BES), with a focus on the performance, advantages, disadvantages, and optimization strategies of anode and cathode materials in microbial fuel cells (MFC) and microbial electrolysis cells (MEC). As the core component of BES, electrode materials directly affect the system's energy conversion efficiency, operational stability, and cost-effectiveness. Currently, commonly used electrode materials include carbon-based materials (such as carbon cloth and graphene), metal materials (such as stainless steel and titanium), and composite materials (such as carbon nanotube-modified materials and metal oxide-coated electrodes). Although these materials have made some progress in terms of conductivity, specific surface area, and biocompatibility, they still face challenges such as limited catalytic activity, high costs, and susceptibility to corrosion. Additionally, this article summarizes optimization strategies for different electrode materials, such as surface modification techniques and nanostructure design, to enhance the catalytic activity, conductivity, and biocompatibility of electrodes. Future research directions include the development of biomimetic catalytic electrodes, intelligent materials, and the realization of large-scale production of electrode materials, thereby advancing bio-electrochemical systems from laboratory to industrial applications. By summarizing existing research achievements and proposing future research directions, this article aims to provide a reference for further innovation and application of BES electrode materials.
Downloads
References
[1] Smita S. Kumar, Vivek K, Sandeep K. Malyan, Jyoti S, Thangavel M, Marshal S. Maskarenj, Prakash C. Ghosh, Arivalagan P. Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for bioelectrochemical treatment of different wastewater streams. Fuel. 2019, 254: 115526.
[2] Yuyang Wang. Carbon felt electrode modified with RGO/PANI composite material for enhancing renewable energy storage in microbial fuel cells. Renewable Energy. 2024, 232: 121109.
[3] Priyanka S, Ahana G, Ganesan S, Krishnasamy S, Gunda M, Subramaniam A, Siddh S, Anjali S, Prabhat R, Ramchandra P. A comprehensive review of microbial electrolysis cells: Integrated for wastewater treatment and hydrogen generation. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2024, 190: 458-474.
[4] Hongqiag Hu, Yanzhen Fan, Hong Liu. Optimization of NiMo catalyst for hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2010, 35(8): 3227-3233.
[5] Tamilmani J, Manickam M, V. Preethi, Samsudeen Naina M. Enhancing biohydrogen production from sugar industry wastewater using metal oxide/graphene nanocomposite catalysts in microbial electrolysis cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(13): 7647-7655.
[6] Zhong, X., Xiao, X., Li, Q. et al. Understanding the active site in chameleon-like bifunctional catalyst for practical rechargeable zinc-air batteries. 2024, Nat Commun 15, 9616.
[7] Hongqiag Hu, Yanzhen Fan, Hong Liu. Hydrogen production in single-chamber tubular microbial electrolysis cells using non-precious-metal catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2009, 34(20): 8535-8542.
[8] M.B. Bahari, C.R. Mamat, A.A. Jalil, N.S. Hassan, M.H. Sawal, S. Rajendran, M.N.H.Z. Alam. Molybdenum as cathode materials: Paving the way for sustainable biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2024, 191: 1633-1647.
[9] Anthony J. Slate, Kathryn A. Whitehead, Dale A.C. Brownson, Craig E. Banks. Microbial fuel cells: An overview of current technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2019, 101: 60-81.
[10] Nithya R, Ananthi V, Yuvakkumar R, Arun A. Turning Waste into Watt: Usage of natural biomass activated carbon-based anode and septic tank wastewater for Microbial Fuel Cell (MFC) based electricity generation. Carbon Trends. 2025, 19: 100461.
[11] Siti Farah Nadiah R, Mimi Hani Abu B, Kee Shyuan L, Mohd S Mastar. Review of high-performance biocathode using stainless steel and carbon-based materials in Microbial Fuel Cell for electricity and water treatment. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2019, 44(58): 30772-30787.
[12] Wang Jun, Li Li, Wweizi Dong. Density Functional Theory Study of Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Different Types of N-Doped Graphene. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica[J]. 2016, 32(1): 321-328.
[13] L. Mauricio Murillo-Herrera, Carlos J. Mingoes, J. Obrero-Pérez, Juan R. Sánchez-Valencia, Michael W, Thielke, Ángel Barranco, Ana B. Jorge Sobrido. Analysis of the impact of remote oxygen plasma treatment on the surface chemistry and electrochemical properties of graphite felt electrodes for redox flow batteries Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. Energy Advances. 2024. 3(10): 2503-2511.
[14] Emma K, Ammara E, Michael M, Manuel Pelayo G, Marco Caffio, Des Gibson, Carlos García Núñez. Three-dimensional graphene foam based triboelectric nanogenerators for energy systems and autonomous sensors. Nano Energy. 2023, 112: 108475.
[15] Yungtai Kao, Christine Young. Trimetallic oxide catalysts from metal-organic frameworks on Ti₃C₂Tx MXene for enhanced water splitting. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2025, 100: 704-712.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







