A Study on Multi-Stage Assembly Production Testing Decision Based on Binary-Coded Genetic Algorithm

Authors

  • Yisheng Gao
  • Jiahe Liu
  • Jiaqi Lu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/3djjjg42

Keywords:

Multi-stage assembly production, Binary-coded genetic algorithm, Quality inspection decision, Cost optimization, Profit maximization.

Abstract

In the current manufacturing industry, intelligent optimization algorithms provide new ideas for quality control of multi-stage assembly production of complex products. However, the traditional inspection strategies and coding methods make it difficult to balance the inspection cost and product quality effectively. Aiming at this challenge, this paper proposes a multi-stage inspection decision model based on a binary coding genetic algorithm, which constructs a nonlinear profit maximization objective function by introducing 0-1 variables to describe the discrete decisions of spare parts inspection and finished product disassembly. The complex process of two processes and eight spare parts is downscaled to equivalent strategy combinations by the semi-finished product encapsulation method, and solved by combining violent search and genetic algorithm. The experimental results show that the model filters out the optimal solution among 65,536 strategies with a maximum profit of 52.94, which verifies the advantages of the algorithm in reducing the computational complexity (the number of strategies is reduced to 32×32×16) and improving the decision-making efficiency (the solution time is 1 second). The study provides an efficient solution to the cost-quality trade-off problem for multi-stage assembly production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chen Min, Liu Qian, Huang Shuai, et al. Environmental cost control system of manufacturing enterprises using artificial intelligence based on value chain of circular economy [J]. Enterprise Information Systems, 2022, 16(8-9): 1856422.

[2] Wang Pei, Qu Hai, Zhang Qianle, et al. Production quality prediction of multistage manufacturing systems using multi-task joint deep learning [J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2023, 70: 48-68.

[3] Liu Shimin, Bao Jinsong, Zheng Pai. A review of digital twin-driven machining: From digitization to intellectualization [J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2023, 67: 361-78.

[4] Zhang Xiangfei, Li Congbo, Zhang Jing, et al. multi-objective evolutionary algorithm-enabled multi-stage collaborative scheduling for automotive production [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2024, 191: 110151.

[5] Praveen Sheeba, Tyagi Neha, Singh Bhagwant, et al. [Retracted] PSO‐Based Evolutionary Approach to Optimize Head and Neck Biomedical Image to Detect Mesothelioma Cancer [J]. BioMed Research International, 2022, 2022(1): 3618197.

[6] Naderi Bahman, Ruiz Rubén, Roshanaei Vahid. Mixed-integer programming vs. constraint programming for shop scheduling problems: new results and outlook [J]. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 2023, 35(4): 817-43.

[7] SS Vinod Chandra, HS Anand. Nature inspired meta heuristic algorithms for optimization problems [J]. Computing, 2022, 104(2): 251-69.

[8] Fan Lei, Han Zhu. Hybrid quantum-classical computing for future network optimization [J]. IEEE Network, 2022, 36(5): 72-6.

[9] Pan Jeng-Shyang, Hu Pei, Snášel Václav, et al. A survey on binary metaheuristic algorithms and their engineering applications [J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023, 56(7): 6101-67.

[10] Alhijawi Bushra, Awajan Arafat. Genetic algorithms: Theory, genetic operators, solutions, and applications [J]. Evolutionary Intelligence, 2024, 17(3): 1245-56.

Downloads

Published

18-05-2025

How to Cite

Gao, Y., Liu, J., & Lu, J. (2025). A Study on Multi-Stage Assembly Production Testing Decision Based on Binary-Coded Genetic Algorithm. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 142, 382-390. https://doi.org/10.54097/3djjjg42