Research on Production Decision Optimization Based on Sampling Inspection and Cost Analysis

Authors

  • Wenzheng Shen
  • Shuyang Chen
  • Ruoyu Guo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/zshtah88

Keywords:

Production Decisions, Resource Allocation, Hypothesis Testing, Optimization Models.

Abstract

With the increasing competition in the manufacturing industry, how to optimize the production process to reduce production costs has become a key issue for enterprises. This paper addresses the optimization of production processes in the manufacturing industry, focusing on sampling inspection schemes and production decision-making models. Based on binomial distribution hypothesis testing with unknown incoming defective rates, this paper develops an optimal sampling program by controlling confidence conditions and simulating rejection domains. This approach minimizes detection frequency while maintaining effective quality control. Furthermore, this paper proposes a comprehensive decision equation model that considers various cost factors including parts procurement, assembly, inspection, dismantling, exchange losses, and market sales of finished products. The model dynamically adjusts the inspection proportions of spare parts and finished products, the dismantling ratio of substandard products, and the procurement ratio of two types of spare parts. Through optimization within specified constraints, the model achieves optimal resource allocation. Analysis of empirical data reveals optimal sampling inspection ratios of 0.0797, 0.0438, and 0.0201 for spare parts 1, spare parts 2, and finished products respectively. Additionally, the model yields an optimal dismantling ratio of 0.9511 for defective products, an optimal proportion of 0.5009 for spare parts 1, and a normalized expected profit value of 11.5548.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] WANG Shengjun, WANG Jingwei, LIU Fan, et al. In-depth practice and optimization strategy of spare parts quality inspection management [J]. Reducing top and speed control technology, 2024, (03): 15 - 7.

[2] ZHANG Rufeng, MAO Tianyu, QU Rui, et al. Co-optimization of energy management and production process in industrial park microgrid based on generalized production process model [J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2024, 52 (22): 59 - 72.

[3] LEE J, CHUA P C, LIU B, et al. A hybrid data-driven optimization and decision-making approach for a digital twin environment: Towards customizing production platforms [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2025, 279: 109447-.

[4] BINGXIN M, QIANWANG D, LIKE Z, et al. Collaborative scheduling of spare parts production and service workers driven by distributed maintenance demand [J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2022, 64: 261 - 74.

[5] LIU Q, SHANG Z, DING K, et al. multi-process routes-based manufacturability assessment and associated application on production decision [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 240: 118114-.

[6] Jia Hui, Tian Jing. Solving the enterprise profit maximization problem using linear programming method [J]. Journal of Taiyuan City Vocational and Technical College, 2010, (11): 79 - 80.

[7] ISLAM N, MIM A Y, PRODHAN M R. APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING FOR PROFIT MAXIMIZATION: A CASE STUDY OF A COOKIES FACTORY IN BANGLADESH [J]. Matrix Science Mathematic, 2022, 6 (1): 01 - 4.

[8] KUMAR J A, SARLA C, KUMAR M R, et al. Application of linear programming in small mechanical based industry for profit maximization [J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 47 (P19): 6701 - 3.

[9] TORRES D, CRICHIGNO J, PADILLA G, et al. Scheduling coupled photovoltaic, battery and conventional energy sources to maximise profit using linear programming [J].

[10] Yin Shaoqun. Research on enterprise cost control based on linear programming [J]. Modern Economic Information, 2010, (03): 58 - 9.

Downloads

Published

23-05-2025

How to Cite

Shen, W., Chen, S., & Guo, R. (2025). Research on Production Decision Optimization Based on Sampling Inspection and Cost Analysis. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 140, 227-235. https://doi.org/10.54097/zshtah88