Manufacturing Decision Optimization Based on Sequential Testing and Cost-Benefit Analysis

Dan Huang; Mengran Xin

doi:10.54097/q2d7qs07

Authors

Dan Huang
Mengran Xin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/q2d7qs07

Keywords:

Sequential Probability Ratio Test, Production Decision Optimization, Cost-Benefit Analysis.

Abstract

In the production process of enterprises, the reasonable decision of each link often affects the profits and costs of enterprises. In order to help enterprises reduce production costs, this paper uses the sequential test method to calculate the reliability of 95% and 90% of the two cases of the significance level and testing force, according to the results to calculate the upper and lower limit threshold and the likelihood ratio of the two cases, the likelihood ratio and the upper and lower threshold of the relationship is compared, so as to obtain the number of tests as little as possible sampling detection scheme; At the same time, this paper establishes a cost-benefit analysis model, calculates and compares the costs and losses (gains) of the four links of parts testing, finished product testing, disassembly of unqualified products and disposal of unqualified products, and obtains specific decision plans for each situation, so as to help enterprises make efficient production decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Liang Z, Zhao K, He K, et al. Improved dynamic programming method for solving multi-objective and multi-stage decision-making problems [J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 15 (1): 1668 - 1668.

[2] Zhao J, Xu N, Niu B, et al. Dynamic event-triggered optimal control for stochastic interconnected nonlinear systems with matched disturbances via adaptive dynamic programming [J]. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2025, 362 (2): 107360 - 107360.

[3] An S, Gan Y, Peng X, et al. Charging Optimization with an Improved Dynamic Programming for Electro-Gasoline Hybrid Powered Compound-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle [J]. Energies, 2024, 18 (1): 30 - 30.

[4] Santos D P E, Buss S B, Rosa D A M, et al. Composite reliability evaluation using sequential Monte Carlo simulation with maximum and minimum loadability analysis [J]. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 2025, 123 (PA): 110023 - 110023.

[5] Li J, Cui X, Liu L, et al. Proton dose deposition in heterogeneous media: A TOPAS Monte Carlo simulation study [J]. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 2025, 217111665 - 111665.

[6] Dutta S, Jain K M, Kumar D. Evaluation of soil heavy metals in Raniganj open-cast coal mines in India: Spatial distribution, Positive Matrix Factorization and Monte Carlo Simulation [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2025194038 - 1055.

[7] Wang J, Wang B, Zhao Q, et al. Sources analysis and risk assessment of heavy metals in soil in a polymetallic mining area in southeastern Hubei based on Monte Carlo simulation. [J]. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2024, 290117607.

[8] S. C J G, Hiroki T, Niccolo G, et al. Mult objective geometry optimization of microchannel heat exchanger using real-coded genetic algorithm [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2022, 202.

[9] Messaoud E. Solving a stochastic programming with recourse model for the stochastic electric capacitated vehicle routing problem using a hybrid genetic algorithm [J]. European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2022, 16 (1): 71 - 90.

[10] Li C. Retraction Note: Air pollution atmospheric environment detection and global tourism line planning management based on genetic algorithm [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (23).