Prediction Model for Carbon Emissions in Hebei Province: An Empirical Study Based on Boosting Algorithm

Authors

  • Yiming Huo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/wd8c8r08

Keywords:

Hebei Province, Boosting Algorithm, Carbon Emissions.

Abstract

In light of China’s ambitious "dual carbon" targets, accurate emission predictions are essential for effective reduction strategies. Traditional forecasting methods often fail to capture the complex nonlinear relationships in emission data, whereas Boosting algorithms enhance prediction accuracy by addressing these challenges. This study leverages Boosting algorithms, a state-of-the-art ensemble learning technique, to predict future carbon emissions in Hebei. By incorporating critical factors such as industrial output, energy consumption, and population dynamics, the study addresses the nonlinearities inherent in carbon emission data, which traditional forecasting models like ARIMA (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average) and RF (Random Forest) struggle to capture. The results demonstrate that the Boosting model significantly outperforms conventional approaches, yielding the most accurate and robust predictions. This research offers valuable insights for shaping targeted carbon reduction strategies in Hebei, supporting its efforts to meet its carbon peak target, and contributing to China’s broader climate objectives. The findings underscore the potential of advanced machine learning techniques to inform data-driven decision-making in the pursuit of sustainable development and carbon neutrality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Filonchyk M, Peterson M P, Zhang L, et al. Greenhouse gases emissions and global climate change: Examining the influence of CO2, CH4, and N2O[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2024: 173359.

[2] Sun L L, Cui H J, Ge Q S. Will China achieve its 2060 carbon neutral commitment from the provincial perspective?[J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2022, 13(2): 169-178.

[3] Chang Y, Zhang Q. Industrial transfer and spatial structure optimization of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei province[J]. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 2020, 15(4): 593-602.

[4] Xu S. The paradox of the energy revolution in China: A socio-technical transition perspective[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 137: 110469.

[5] Kakodkar R, He G, Demirhan C D, et al. A review of analytical and optimization methodologies for transitions in multi-scale energy systems[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 160: 112277.

[6] Ning Y, Kazemi H, Tahmasebi P. A comparative machine learning study for time series oil production forecasting: ARIMA, LSTM, and Prophet[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2022, 164: 105126.

[7] Allal Z, Noura H N, Salman O, et al. Machine learning solutions for renewable energy systems: Applications, challenges, limitations, and future directions[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 354: 120392.

[8] Chen W, Lei X, Chakrabortty R, et al. Evaluation of different boosting ensemble machine learning models and novel deep learning and boosting framework for head-cut gully erosion susceptibility[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 284: 112015.

[9] Ganaie M A, Hu M, Malik A K, et al. Ensemble deep learning: A review[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2022, 115: 105151.

[10] Brukhim N, Daniely A, Mansour Y, et al. Multiclass boosting: simple and intuitive weak learning criteria[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024, 36.

[11] Hasan B M S, Abdulazeez A M. A review of principal component analysis algorithm for dimensionality reduction[J]. Journal of Soft Computing and Data Mining, 2021, 2(1): 20-30.

[12] Dubey A K, Kumar A, García-Díaz V, et al. Study and analysis of SARIMA and LSTM in forecasting time series data[J]. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2021, 47: 101474.

[13] Arabameri A, Chandra Pal S, Rezaie F, et al. Decision tree-based ensemble machine learning approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping[J]. Geocarto International, 2022, 37(16): 4594-4627.

[14] Chicco D, Warrens M J, Jurman G. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation[J]. Peerj computer science, 2021, 7: e623.

[15] HAN N, LUO X. Carbon emission peak prediction and reduction potential in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from the perspective of multiple scenarios[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(5): 1277-1288.

[16] Wei L, Liu H, Wu L. Spatial distribution of floating population in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Region and its correlations with synergistic development[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(3): 5949-5965.

[17] Rane N, Choudhary S P, Rane J. Ensemble deep learning and machine learning: applications, opportunities, challenges, and future directions[J]. Studies in Medical and Health Sciences, 2024, 1(2): 18-41.

Downloads

Published

25-02-2025