Research On Optimal Water Level of Great Lakes Based on Dynamic Optimization Model and PID Control Algorithm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/cjg5fy19Keywords:
Probability-Utility Mapping Model, Dynamic Optimization, PID Controller.Abstract
This study aims to determine the optimal water levels of the Great Lakes by analyzing historical data from 2012 to 2022, including water levels of the lakes and flow rates of the rivers connecting them, to identify underlying trends. A multi-objective optimization model is developed, which holistically accounts for the welfare of local ecological, economic, and social stakeholders. By applying a genetic algorithm, the model calculates the optimal water levels for different times of the year. Furthermore, a dynamic relationship among the Great Lakes is modeled using differential equations, and a PID control algorithm is implemented to manage the optimal water levels under natural conditions. Compared with traditional algorithm, this approach not only enhances the precision of water level predictions but also introduces an adaptive control system that responds to real-time data. The integration of these methods allows for a more nuanced management of water levels, catering to the fluctuating demands of ecological, economic, and social stakeholders. A subsequent sensitivity analysis reveals that the proposed control algorithm demonstrates a high sensitivity to varying natural conditions and yields water levels more favorable than the actual recorded levels from the perspective of most stakeholders.
Downloads
References
[1] Shang S, Shang S. Simplified Lake surface area method for the minimum ecological water level of lakes and wetlands[J]. Water, 2018, 10(8): 1056.
[2] Manli H., Jian Z., Dafa D., et al. Research on the optimal allocation of regional water resources based on genetic algorithm [J]. People’s Yangtze River, 2008, 39(6):4.
[3] Jingsi SUN. A CASE STUDY ON LUOYANG CITY: OPTIMIZATION OF WATER RESOURCE ALLOCATION BASED ON RESIDENT’S EUPHORIA[J]. Resources and Industries, 2021, 23(3): 88.
[4] Ahmadianfar I, Kheyrandish A, Jamei M, et al. Optimizing operating rules for multi-reservoir hydropower generation systems: An adaptive hybrid differential evolution algorithm [J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 167: 774-790.
[5] Pedrizzetti G, Pedrizzetti G. Conservation of Energy (Bernoulli Balance) [J]. Fluid Mechanics for Cardiovascular Engineering: A Primer, 2022: 81-93.
[6] Lenters, J.D., Anderton, J.B., Blanken, P., Spence, C., & Suyker, A.E. (2013). Assessing the Impacts of Climate Variability and Change on Great Lakes Evaporation. In D. Brown, D. Bidwell, & L. Briley (Eds.), 2011 Project Reports. Great LakesIntegrated Sciences and Assessments (GLISA) Center. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
[7] Okhravi S. The use of the Manning equation is not safe for different river types. What are the alternatives[C]//Proc. 34th Conference of Young Hydrologists Professionals in Water Sciences. International Hydrological Program of UNESCO, Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute, November. 2022, 10.
[8] Borase R P, Maghade D K, Sondkar S Y, et al. A review of PID control, tuning methods and applications[J]. International Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2021, 9: 818-827.
[9] Joseph S B, Dada E G, Abidemi A, et al. Metaheuristic algorithms for PID controller parameters tuning: Review, approaches and open problems[J]. Heliyon, 2022, 8(5).
[10] Wang L. PID control system design and automatic tuning using MATLAB/Simulink[M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







