Research on Strip Steel Process Optimization Based on Data-Driven Approach and Genetic Algorithm

Authors

  • Yiliang Huang
  • Yang Liu
  • Wenjian Wei

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/69k0rb19

Keywords:

Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Genetic Algorithm, Process Optimization.

Abstract

In the context of modern manufacturing, ensuring consistent product quality while optimizing production processes is a significant challenge. This paper presents a comprehensive approach to improving the quality inspection and process optimization of steel strip production using machine learning models and genetic algorithms. Historical production data were pre-processed through cleaning, feature selection, and z-score normalization to ensure accuracy in the model's performance. Two classification models, Logistic Regression and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), were evaluated for their ability to predict product quality. The Logistic Regression model outperformed KNN with an accuracy of 0.36, making it the preferred choice for the online inspection system. To optimize the steel strip production process and achieve the target hardness value, a Genetic Algorithm (GA) was applied to determine the best combination of process parameters. The GA simulation considered key factors such as strip thickness, width, carbon and silicon content, and furnace temperatures. The results demonstrate that the integration of a predictive model and optimization algorithm provides a data-driven solution for enhancing product quality and operational stability in steel strip manufacturing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] AMMAR M, HALEEM A, JAVAID M, et al. Improving material quality management and manufacturing organizations system through Industry 4.0 technologies [J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 45: 5089-5096.

[2] VAFADAR A, GUZZOMI F, RASSAU A, et al. Advances in metal additive manufacturing: a review of common processes, industrial applications, and current challenges [J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11 (3): 1213.

[3] LI X, LIU X, YUE C, et al. Systematic review on tool breakage monitoring techniques in machining operations [J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2022, 176: 103882.

[4] JI C, SUN W. A review on data-driven process monitoring methods: Characterization and mining of industrial data [J]. Processes, 2022, 10 (2): 335.

[5] ZAFARZADEH M, WIKTORSSON M, BAALSRUD HAUGE J. A systematic review on technologies for data-driven production logistics: Their role from a holistic and value creation perspective [J]. Logistics, 2021, 5 (2): 24.

[6] van den GOORBERGH R, van SMEDEN M, TIMMERMAN D, et al. The harm of class imbalance corrections for risk prediction models: illustration and simulation using logistic regression [J]. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2022, 29 (9): 1525-1534.

[7] KOHLI S, GODWIN G T, UROLAGIN S. Sales prediction using linear and KNN regression [M] // Advances in Machine Learning and Computational Intelligence: Proceedings of ICMLCI 2019. Springer, 2020: 321-329.

[8] WANG J, XU C, ZHANG J, et al. Big data analytics for intelligent manufacturing systems: A review [J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2022, 62: 738-752.

[9] ALAM T, QAMAR S, DIXIT A, et al. Genetic algorithm: Reviews, implementations, and applications [J]. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2007.12673, 2020.

[10] ZHOU Y, WANG Y, WANG K, et al. Hybrid genetic algorithm method for efficient and robust evaluation of remaining useful life of supercapacitors [J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 260: 114169.

Downloads

Published

25-02-2025